Samsung Galaxy Note9 efficiency in comparison with Galaxy S9+ and Note8 #Toronto #Montreal #Calgary #Ottawa #Canada

Advertisements:

Now that we’ve obtained our fingers on the Samsung Galaxy Note9we’re capable of make some comparisons between the Note8 and Galaxy S9+ when it comes to efficiency.

We’ve obtained some numbers from a global dualSIM variant of the Galaxy Note9, so this one is powered by the Exynos 9810 CPU. We’re evaluating it to each variants of the Galaxy S9+.

Starting with graphics efficiency, the Exynos-powered Note9 wasn’t on the high of any of the benchmark exams. The Galaxy S9+ with its Snapdragon 845 was capable of get one of the best body charges out of the graphic-focused GFX Bench exams.

GFX 3.1 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is healthier

  • Samsung Galaxy S9+ (Snapdragon)
    61
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+
    47
  • Samsung Galaxy Note9
    45
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    43
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    42

GFX 3.1 Manhattan (onscreen)

Higher is healthier

  • Samsung Galaxy S9+ (Snapdragon)
    34
  • Samsung Galaxy Note9
    25
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+
    24
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    23
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    20

GFX 3.1 Car scene (1080p offscreen)

Higher is healthier

  • Samsung Galaxy S9+ (Snapdragon)
    35
  • Samsung Galaxy Note9
    28
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+
    28
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    25
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    25

GFX 3.1 Car scene (onscreen)

Higher is healthier

  • Samsung Galaxy S9+ (Snapdragon)
    20
  • Samsung Galaxy Note9
    15
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+
    14
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    13
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    13

The Note9 sees scores about 25% increased numbers than the Note8. Meanwhile, the Snapdragon 845-powered Galaxy S9+ nonetheless lies forward, surpassing the Galaxy Note9 by about 6%.

AnTuTu 7

Higher is healthier

  • Samsung Galaxy S9+ (Snapdragon)
    264044
  • Samsung Galaxy Note9
    248823
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+
    246660
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    201065

In GeekBench, the Note9 did higher, although wasn’t very far off from the Galaxy S9+’s rating. In truth, GeekBench’s scores favor the Exynos variations whereas Antutu favored the Snapdragon variants.

GeekBench 4.1 (multi-core)

Higher is healthier

  • Samsung Galaxy Note9
    9026
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+
    8883
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+ (Snapdragon)
    8349
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    6784
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    6590

Single-core scores are much better on the Exynos 9810 than the Galaxy S9+’s Snapdragon 845. The distinction in single-core scores has a a lot bigger hole between the 9810 and the 845 than between the Exynos 8895 and the Snapdragon 835.

GeekBench 4.1 (single-core)

Higher is healthier

  • Samsung Galaxy S9+
    3771
  • Samsung Galaxy Note9
    3642
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+ (Snapdragon)
    2199
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    1987
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    1862

We examined a 128GB model of the Note9, which comes with 6GB of RAM. We marvel if the 512GB model of the cellphone with 8GB of RAM would carry out any otherwise.

Samsung’s Water Carbon Cooling ought to make for higher efficiency underneath prolonged durations of gaming or intensive use. Less warmth means much less CPU throttling and higher efficiency for enjoying hours of Fortnite.

Here is a Source Link for this Article.

Advertisements:

Jean Ricks

0 Comments

No comments!

There are no comments yet, but you can be first to comment this article.

Leave reply

Only registered users can comment.